phi()
function in the
stokes
packagefunction (n)
{
ktensor(spray(n, 1))
}
To cite the stokes
package in publications, please use
Hankin (2022b). Function
phi()
returns a tensor dual to the standard basis of \(V=\mathbb{R}^n\). Here I discuss
phi()
but there is some overlap between this vignette and
the tensorprod
vignette.
In a memorable passage, Spivak (1965) states (theorem 4.1):
Integration on chains
Let \(v_1,\ldots,v_n\) be a basis for \(V\), and let \(\phi_1,\ldots,\phi_n\) be the dual basis, \(\phi_i(v_j)=\delta_{ij}\). Then the set of all \(k\)-fold tensor products
\[ \phi_{i_1}\otimes\cdots\otimes\phi_{i_k}\qquad 1\leqslant i_1,\ldots,i_k\leqslant n \]
is a basis for \(\mathcal{J}(V)\), which therefore has dimension \(n^k\).
- Michael Spivak, 1969 (Calculus on Manifolds, Perseus books). Page 75
Function phi()
returns a very simple tensor:
## A linear map from V^1 to R with V=R^4:
## val
## 4 = 1
First we will verify the properties of phi()
, using
\(V=\mathbb{R}^5\), specifically
\[ \phi_i(e_j) = \delta_{ij} = \begin{cases} 1, & i=j\\ 0 & i\neq j. \end{cases} \]
(package idiom is to use e()
for basis vectors as
opposed to Spivak’s \(v\)). As
numerical verification, we will check that \(\phi_3(e_2)=0\), \(\phi_3(e_3)=1\), \(\phi_3(e_4)=0\):
## [1] 0 1 0
A more severe test might be
aa <- function(n){
outer(seq_len(n), seq_len(n),
Vectorize(function(i, j){as.function(phi(i))(as.matrix(e(j, n)))}))
}
aa(5)
## [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
## [1,] 1 0 0 0 0
## [2,] 0 1 0 0 0
## [3,] 0 0 1 0 0
## [4,] 0 0 0 1 0
## [5,] 0 0 0 0 1
Above, we see that the matrix is \(I_5\), as expected. Further:
## [1] TRUE
The objects created by phi()
may be multiplied together
using tensorprod()
or its binary operator
%X%
:
## A linear map from V^3 to R with V=R^5:
## val
## 4 3 5 = 1
If we want to create arbitrary tensor products of \(\phi\) objects the most natural way would
be to use tensorprod()
repeatedly:
## A linear map from V^5 to R with V=R^8:
## val
## 4 5 6 7 8 = 1
However, function phi()
simply takes a vector:
## A linear map from V^3 to R with V=R^5:
## val
## 2 5 1 = 1
This creates an element of the basis set, in this case \(\phi_2\otimes\phi_5\otimes\phi_1\). Verification is straightforward:
## [1] 9 4 7 1 2 6 3 8 5
## [1] TRUE
We will consider an element \(X\) of \(\mathcal{J}^{2}(V)\) where \(V=\mathbb{R}^3\) and construct an explicit basis for it along the lines of Spivak’s observation above.
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^3:
## val
## 3 1 = 3
## 2 1 = 2
## 1 2 = 1
Thus \(X=\phi_1\otimes\phi_2 +2\phi_2\otimes\phi_1 +3\phi_3\otimes\phi_1\). Spivak asserts that \(\mathcal{J}^{2}(V)\) has dimension \(n^k=3^2=9\).
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^3:
## val
## 2 1 = 2
## 1 2 = 1
## 3 1 = 3
With a little effort, we can create all \(3^2=9\) elements of a basis as follows:
## [[1]]
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^1:
## val
## 1 1 = 1
##
## [[2]]
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^2:
## val
## 2 1 = 1
##
## [[3]]
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^3:
## val
## 3 1 = 1
##
## [[4]]
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^2:
## val
## 1 2 = 1
##
## [[5]]
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^2:
## val
## 2 2 = 1
##
## [[6]]
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^3:
## val
## 3 2 = 1
##
## [[7]]
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^3:
## val
## 1 3 = 1
##
## [[8]]
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^3:
## val
## 2 3 = 1
##
## [[9]]
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^3:
## val
## 3 3 = 1
Or it might be logically better to use ellipsis constructs to pass multiple arguments:
## A linear map from V^3 to R with V=R^6:
## val
## 3 4 6 = 1
Then we could have
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^3:
## val
## 2 1 = 2
## 1 2 = 1
## 3 1 = 3
## [1] TRUE
The tensor product is left- and right distributive. To illustrate this we can use the package to calculate, say, \((2\phi_1+3\phi_2)\otimes(5\phi_3+7\phi_4)\):
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^4:
## val
## 2 4 = 21
## 1 4 = 14
## 2 3 = 15
## 1 3 = 10
Above we see package form for the result which is \(10\phi_1\phi_3 + 14\phi_1\phi_4 + 15\phi_2\phi_3 + 21\phi_2\phi_4\) in algebraic notation.
Consider the following tensor
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^7:
## val
## 4 4 = 8
## 7 3 = 9
## 3 5 = 7
We may express \(b\) as the sum of its three terms, each with a coefficient:
## A linear map from V^2 to R with V=R^7:
## val
## 4 4 = 8
## 3 5 = 7
## 7 3 = 9
Above, observe that the order of the terms may differ between the two
methods, as per disordR
discipline (Hankin
2022a), but they are algebraically identical:
## [1] TRUE
Alt()
Function Alt()
returns an alternating tensor as
documented in the Alt
vignette in the package. It works
nicely with phi()
:
## A linear map from V^3 to R with V=R^3:
## val
## 1 2 3 = 1
## A linear map from V^3 to R with V=R^3:
## val
## 3 2 1 = -1
## 3 1 2 = 1
## 2 3 1 = 1
## 2 1 3 = -1
## 1 3 2 = -1
## 1 2 3 = 1
disordR
Package.” https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03856; arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2210.03856.